Idiots

WHAT COULD BE MORE OFFENSIVE THAN EPISODE ONE?

This. This is worse. The boys try to fix last episode's fallout by:
1. Doubling down
2. Introducing concepts like "friendly racism" and "friendly incest"
3. Investigating Greta Thunberg's Gaza tourism as a potential character arc

DO I HAVE TO READ THE FIRST BOOK FIRST?

Never let anyone tell you what to do. You were born free ... hopefully. If not, then congrats! You made it! You're free now. Free to do, write or read whatever you want.

IS THIS THE SAME COVER WITH DIFFERENT COLORS?

Nothing gets by you, huh? It's a deliberate, meta-layered commentary on the tension between familiarity and novelty ... and even if it weren't — hypothetically speaking — you should never judge a book by its cover.

WHO APPROVED THIS?

An anonymous Amazon employee who's either based AF or has a dangerously low score on the conscientiousness spectrum. Maybe both. We don't know.

CONTENT WARNINGS INCLUDE:

• Logical fallacies dressed as "hot takes"
• Theological fan fiction
• Gooning stats

WHY IS THERE STILL NO READING SAMPLE?

Jesus, what is it with you and your reading samples? You can't sample an orgasm, can you? Consider this your sample — now hit the button before we're banned.